|





Quick Links
1995, 1996,
1997
1998, 1999,
2000
2001, 2002,
2003
2004, 2005,
2006
2007
| |
| Category: Trinidad Society |
Date: 06 May 01 |
|
Labour
Minister Harry Partap, to his credit, responded in last Sunday’s
Guardian expediently and in full to the column which was, for the record,
inspired by a true (not hypothetical) story of two low-paid women who were
sacked from their place of employment for asking for their NIS numbers and
TD4 forms.
It
was not a particularly startling story, but multiply that by thousands of
men and women (up to an alarming 80% of the workforce in this country
according to the Minister of Labour) who are barely paid the minimum wage,
and whose benefits are being withheld, and we’re looking at a systematic
creation of a massive underclass by exploitative employers.
Minister
Partap pointed at the National Minimum Wage of seven dollars an hour, the
Maternity Benefits Act and amendments to the Minimum Wage Act as evidence
of the Government’s commitment towards bringing justice to workers, and
law-breaking employers to heel.
I
also was sent a draft copy of the Basic Conditions of Work and Minimum
Wages Bill 2000, now before the Tripartite Committee of the Lower House
for comment. The Bill, claims Partap, will provide “a basic floor of
rights for all workers.”
Its
flagship proposals include “a level of Sick Leave and Holiday with pay;
minimum terms and conditions; the treatment of time off for religious
worship; the treatment of HIV workers and Sexual Harassment of Women in
the workplace.”
In
broad terms, it aims to establish a Basic Conditions of Work and Minimum
Wages Commission, close loopholes, especially in terms of the use of
contracts for employees and increase the power and jurisdiction of the
Industrial Court so a wider range of offences are heard more quickly.
As
promised, the following is a summary of the proposed Bill:
Part II - General principles of good employment
practice
 |
A
dependent contractor (someone who works primarily for one employer) cannot
have worse terms and conditions than regular employees as defined by this
Bill. |
Part III - Hours of
Work
 |
A
workweek is set at 40 hours per week. For Sunday work, employees are to be
paid double their regular wages (or 1.5 times the regular wage if employee
normally works on a Sunday). |
 |
Public
Holidays to be paid double time. |
 |
Night
work - employee should receive overtime time pay or a shift allowance. |
Part IV -
Leave
 |
Minimum
leave is ten working days. |
 |
Employees
are entitled to 14 working days’ sick leave each year. |
 |
Employees
are entitled to 4 days’ “family responsibility” leave annually. |
Part VI - Termination of
employment
 |
Notice
must be given of termination and payment must be given in lieu of notice.
Exception is made for termination for cause recognised by law. |
 |
Employers
should set up or continue pension plans. It is not clear that NIS is
included in the definition of pension plans. |
Part VII - Prohibition of Child and Forced Labour
 |
Child
labour is allowed. However, the definition of child labour that is not
allowed will need to be clarified. |
 |
Forced
labour is not allowed. |
Part VIII - HIV and AIDS
protection
 |
No
discrimination is allowed against person suffering with AIDS or HIV. |
Part IX - Sexual
Harassment
 |
Sexual
harassment is specifically forbidden. |
Part X - Agency
Employment
 |
A
company, which uses the services of a contractor or agency, is held
jointly liable with the contractor or the agency for breaches of this
Bill. |
Part XI - The Minimum Wage
Commission
 |
Lists
the makeup and job description of the Basic Conditions of Work and Minimum
Wage Commission. |
 |
The
Minister must give 25 days’ notice of any draft Order, to allow for
objections. |
 |
Ministry
of Labour officials have access to documents and staff necessary. They can
get a court order if access is denied. |
 |
The
fine for breaking the laws as stated in this Bill is $30,000. |
The
Bill, in broad outline, seems reasonable. Since it aims to empower the
majority of our working population (who are also the most vulnerable -
among them many single mothers) its intentions are commendable.
A
Bill that could, if it has sufficient mechanisms in place for
implementation, have far-reaching effects on our country, from crime to
productivity. But there are unanswered questions,
(for example, the concept of equal pay for work of equal value is a
recipe for a great deal of acrimony, because who decides what is “equal
value”), and there are clauses over which we all, members of the
Tripartite Committee of the Lower House, and other parliamentarians, will
want a hearing.
A
healthy debate can make the difference between a piece of paper and
something that works. Now is your time to get hold of the Bill from the
Ministry of Labour, or comment on the summary above.
Next
week: The proposed Basic Conditions of Work and Minimum Wages Bill, 2000.

|
|